CLOSE

Specials

I agree We use cookies on this website to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies. More info

Skip to: Curated Story Group 1
Life Sciences Review
US
EUROPE
APAC
CANADA

About Us

Conference

Partner With Us

  • US
    • EUROPE
    • APAC
    • CANADA
    • LATAM
  • Drug Discovery
    Antibodies
    BioTech
    Cell and Gene Therapy
    Clinical Trial
    Drug Discovery and Development
    Life Science AI
    Regenerative Medicine
    Therapeutics
  • Biomanufacturing
    Biomanufacturing
    Bioprocessing
    Blood Bank
    CDMO
    Clinical Laboratory
    CRO
    Life Science Testing
    Skin Care
    Supplements
  • Business Services
    Life Science Consulting
    Life Science Facility Service
    Life Science Financial Services
    Life Science Marketing
    Life Science Recruitment Firms
    Pharma Wholesale and Distribution
    Pharmacy Management
    Regulatory and Compliance
    Regulatory Services
  • Leadership Perspectives
  • Innovation Insights
  • Research
  • News
  • Magazines
  • CXO Awards
×
#

Life Science Review Weekly Brief

Be first to read the latest tech news, Industry Leader's Insights, and CIO interviews of medium and large enterprises exclusively from Life Science Review

Subscribe

loading

Thank you for Subscribing to Life Science Review Weekly Brief

A featured contribution from Leadership Perspectives: a curated forum reserved for leaders nominated by our subscribers and vetted by our Life Sciences Review Advisory Board.

Revenue Cycle Director at South County Health

Mat Clerrico, CRCR, CSPPM, CSPR

Charge Reconciliation Challenges - Professional Charges and Multiple EMRs

Mat Clerrico

Mat Clerrico

Though many billing complications can affect reimbursement, I’ve found that one of the most consistent challenges within our Revenue Cycle is ensuring complete charge capture when the provider documentation is recorded in one system, but the coding and billing occur in another. 


We are not alone in this struggle, many healthcare facilities and systems utilize different systems for their acute EMR and their ambulatory EMR. Given the complexity of the charge processes and the challenge of interfacing charges between aging systems, it is vital to institute robust charge capture procedures to avoid revenue leakage.


“Given the complexity of the charge processes and the challenge of interfacing charges between aging systems, it is vital to institute robust charge capture procedures to avoid revenue leakage.”


In this article, we will explore some of the most significant challenges, and strategies to ensure better charge capture.


Challenges


Lack of Standardization:  Clinicians, department leaders, and other stakeholders may not be engaged or even directly aware of the intricacies of the charging process for their services. This is particularly true of any automated charging that is set up based on background settings or system triggers.


Hardware/Software Intricacies: Health systems often deploy bolt-on modules or systems for specialty functions, all of which carry their own intricacies and charging procedures. The more highly specialized, or technical the system is, the more difficult it is to set up and monitor charge capture.


Incomplete or Inaccurate Charge Data: Charge data can be incomplete due to a lack of detailed documentation or missing charges, while inaccurate charge data may result from human errors in data entry or coding. These issues can result in under-billing or even over-billing, both of which can cause significant downstream billing headaches.


So how do you overcome the challenges listed above? The most important step is to confirm that all of the appropriate stakeholders are at the table when creating a charge capture policy and procedure and that those stakeholders share an aligned mental model of 100 percent charge capture. Remember that partnership and solid lines of communication will be key to ensuring the wider success of any charge capture program.


Strategies


Our Revenue Cycle department has enjoyed success when following the steps below:


1. Work with stakeholders from each charging department and Revenue Cycle to identify ‘sources of truth’ for each charge.


a. For example, if you are trying to capture professional charges consults, your ‘source of truth’ is likely the signed consult note from the provider.


2. Work with data analytics partners to develop comparative reporting based on the ‘source of truth data to ensure that all expected charges are captured within the professional billing system.


3. Assign thresholds and escalation procedures for any identified missing or delayed charges.


4. Assign leadership ownership and responsibility for monitoring and compliance.


5Identify a regular meeting cadence to review charge capture data and performance.


a. These meetings will likely need to be more frequent if the policy is new to the group.


It is sometimes tempting to establish a paper process for charge reconciliation (the dreaded ‘charge sheets’). Paper processes should only be utilized during system downtime because they are too manual to sustain, and introduce more avenues to errors.


I would encourage all health systems that utilize a billing system that is different than the EMR to establish department-specific charge reconciliation procedures and to confirm that the process is set up to be durable and analytically robust. Nothing is better for a Revenue Cycle leader’s sleep than confidence in the charging activity of all departments. 


The articles from these contributors are based on their personal expertise and viewpoints, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of their employers or affiliated organizations.
The Leadership Perspectives forum brings together voices shaping the future of life sciences. It features leaders who are advancing change across the industry through strategic leadership and applied insight.
EDITOR'S CHOICE
  • Willis Towers Watson

    ICON [NASDAQ: ICLR]

    The Significant Increase in Demand for Clinical Research Associates (CRAs)

    Helen Yeardley, Executive Vice President, ICON [NASDAQ: ICLR]

  • Willis Towers Watson

    PacBio [NASDAQ: PACB]

    The Talent - Culture Continuum: How to Manage an Innovation Culture Amid Growth and Change

    Alvin Hom, Head of Global Talent Acquisition, PacBio [NASDAQ: PACB]

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Repligen Corp [NASDAQ: RGEN]

    Gene Therapy-Therapeutic Viral Vectors; Manufacturing, Challenges, and Innovation

    Rachel Legmann, PhD, Senior Director of Technology, Gene Therapy, Repligen Corp

  • Willis Towers Watson

    Ionis Pharmaceuticals [NASDAQ: IONS]

    Bridging the Diversity Divide

    Victoria Sanjurjo, Medical Director, Clinical Development, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc [NASDAQ: IONS]

Life Sciences Review
Follow on LinkedIn

About

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Partner With Us

Stay Connected

  • Subscribe
  • Newsletter
  • Sitemap

Contact Us

  • editor@lifesciencesreview.com
  • sales@lifesciencesreview.com
  • marketing@lifesciencesreview.com

Legal

  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

© 2026 Life Sciences Review. All rights reserved. Headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.

This content is copyright protected

However, if you would like to share the information in this article, you may use the link below:

https://investment-banking.lifesciencesreview.com/leadership-perspective/charge-reconciliation-challenges-professional-charges-and-multiple-emrs-nwid-2282.html